In which way is a BitRock installer different to a RPM package?

asked 05 Sep '11, 08:18

Jake's gravatar image

Jake ♦♦
accept rate: 98%

BitRock installers serve a different purpose than RPMs. RPMs are designed and optimized to package applications for a particular distribution. BitRock Installers are designed to allow the same software package to be installed across all Linux distributions.

Additionally, RPMs do not allow interaction with the end-user and require root privileges to install any kind of application. BitRock installers allow full interaction with the end-user in graphical, text and unattended modes.

There are scenarios where integration with the underlying package management system can be desirable. BitRock can provide support for generating RPM installers from a BitRock XML project file and integrating with the RPM database at installation time. Please email us if you are interested in these capabilities.

There are also differences in the way the action lists are executed. Please read the following article for a more detailed explanation:

Which Action Lists are executed in RPM/DEB packages?


answered 05 Sep '11, 08:19

Jake's gravatar image

Jake ♦♦
accept rate: 98%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported



Asked: 05 Sep '11, 08:18

Seen: 2,119 times

Last updated: 15 Sep '11, 05:18